liuy1103 / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

Does not allow for multiple filtering #5

Open liuy1103 opened 2 months ago

liuy1103 commented 2 months ago

For instance, if there are no allergens present in a recipe, as a user if I want to filter for recipes with no allergens, I might forget whether I used "nil" or "NA" when I previously saved the recipe information. So when filtering for recipes with no allergens, I have to filter NA and filter nil.

Might be helpful to include checks for multiple allergen categories, such as filter nil, NA, or filter egg, dairy so that users can filter multiple allergens at one go.

image.png

As seen in screenshot, based on list, users are unable to tell which recipes have allergens as those information are not shown on the list. Thus when filtering, might become quite user unfriendly.

nus-pe-script commented 2 months ago

Team's Response

Thanks for pointing this out! We definitely agree, however, filtering by multiple words was not in scope for our project. It was marked as a 'Nice to Have.' For that reason, we have marked this as 'Not in Scope`.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.NotInScope]

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]