Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
The presence of the unableToJoinURL could trigger the enforcement of unique
userIDs. That way, none of the existing API implementations would be affected.
Original comment by ffdixon@gmail.com
on 12 Sep 2012 at 11:56
Would it make more sense to have "unableToJoinURL" implemented as a parameter
of the 'create' controller/api resource?
It makes for one less parameter that is visible to the user (since they can
view the join URL). Keep in mind the 'unableToJoinURL' may be an internal,
non-public resource implemented by a third party app which then forwards the
user to a proper public-facing localized error page. I personally feel its best
to limit the amount of data exposed to the user, even if they can't change it
as a result of the checksum.
Original comment by ramirez....@gmail.com
on 25 Feb 2013 at 7:06
Issue 981 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by ffdixon@gmail.com
on 16 Mar 2014 at 1:49
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ffdixon@gmail.com
on 12 Sep 2012 at 11:52