Open justinGilmer opened 6 years ago
This could be handy for authors who want to make websites in addition.
Not sure what we should do with this info though; I'm not convinced the issue tracker is the right place for it. Maybe we should have a markdown file here which provides links to other tools which might be of use? Thoughts?
In the long run, it would be a good idea to have full-text HTML available somehow. My reason being that scrapers fail spectacularly on PDF documents.
Well, it might be better to use pandoc or even org-mode exporter with an appropriate set of stylesheets, mostly because they allow easier fine tuned control without resorting to using XML [engrafo is based on LaTeXML].
I've heard pandoc mentioned a number of times; have you used it, @HaoZeke ?
Yup @davidlmobley. In fact I've used it as the basis of many documentation setups, including zenYoda, docuYoda and a site with proper math formatting. For seeing how a document might be structured in markdown you can check this report and it's pdf output.
Thanks, @HaoZeke !!
Just a really neat repository for converting LaTeX docs into pretty impressive looking HTML pages.
Not entirely useful for this journal, but could be nice to keep in mind.
https://github.com/arxiv-vanity/engrafo Could also generate HTML pages in addition to pdf.