search

livecomsjournal / article_templates

Templates for use in preparing articles for the Living Journal of Computational Molecular Sciences (LiveCoMS)
http://www.livecomsjournal.org/
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
9 stars 14 forks source link

Posting DOI's properly in articles and on website #66

Closed mrshirts closed 5 years ago

mrshirts commented 5 years ago

See the following for how we are supposed to include DOI's in article information; this should be reflected in the article templates (potentially in the web site as well). https://www.crossref.org/display-guidelines/

dwsideriusNIST commented 5 years ago

I'll get to work on the templates and latex files. We'll have to ask the papers that are already online to sync-up the CLS and BST files and recompile.

mrshirts commented 5 years ago

They know there will be a last pass before moving from ASAP to published issue - if they are willing to do one more intermediate step, then that would be nice. :)

dwsideriusNIST commented 5 years ago

One corollary that I can address before PR #67 is reviewed:

Do we want to include the issue number in the footer? I notice that the citation is being given as:

volume.issue.articleID (e.g., https://doi.org/10.33011/livecoms.1.1.5067)

davidlmobley commented 5 years ago

@mrshirts @dmzuckerman what do you think about issue number in the footer? I don't particularly care since the article seems like the primary important thing (in fact I'd argue against it just based on the idea that I think each article should be stand-alone and this is a way to help people think that way) but I don't feel that strongly about it.

davidlmobley commented 5 years ago

Once @dwsideriusNIST has this in the templates, ping me and I'll check the website content.

Responses are going to be slow for me for a while; dealing with two grant proposals before Christmas.

mrshirts commented 5 years ago

Good question. the final article version will be the one released with the issue, so it wouldn't hurt the workflow at all. So I don't see any problem with it. Since it's now clearly in the DOI as well :)

davidlmobley commented 5 years ago

@mrshirts I am not quite sure which side of this you come down on then; "I don't see any problem with it" is a little ambiguous since Dan asked about whether we WANTED to include the issue number in the footer and I advocated for NOT including it in the footer; I'm unclear whether "I don't see any problem with it" means "I don't see any problem with including it in the footer" or "I don't see any problem with leaving it out of the footer."

What's your take?

mrshirts commented 5 years ago

Sorry, I meant I don't see any problem with having it in the footer.

dwsideriusNIST commented 5 years ago

See PR #68 for update to CLS and sample TeX that includes the issue number in the footer.

dwsideriusNIST commented 5 years ago

Everything in this issue thread is covered in PRs #68 and #72. It can be closed.