Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Indeed, a way to solve your issue could be to create a "XADataSourceSpy", and
also a "XAConnectionSpy", but the problem is: should we provide support only
for the method "PooledConnection#getConnection()" (that could be wrapped easily
by a ConnectionSpy)? I don't really see the point for a XA resource.
Providing a full support for XADataSources would be a completely new branch of
log4jdbc, we would need to create "ConnectionEventListenerSpy",
"StatementEventListenerSpy", "XAResourceSpy", etc.
If you wanted to provide such a patch, I could consider it.
Original comment by frederic...@gmail.com
on 21 Mar 2014 at 12:34
[deleted comment]
As a workaround, I've also found that my JTA transaction manager (Atomikos) has
a datasource bean that can be used to wrap the XA datasources and thus provide
the regular datasource interface that can be further wrapped by DataSourceSpy.
e.g.:
<!-- Atomikos's XA capable pooling data source. -->
<bean id="myJTADataSource" class="com.atomikos.jdbc.AtomikosDataSourceBean">
<property name="xaDataSource" ref="myh2XaDataSource" />
<property name="uniqueResourceName" value="myDatabase" />
...
</bean>
<!-- Special logging wrapper for our data source that spys on JDBC calls -->
<bean id="myJTADataSourceSpied" class="net.sf.log4jdbc.sql.jdbcapi.DataSourceSpy">
<constructor-arg ref="myJTADataSource" />
</bean>
I have to believe this approach is readily available for almost any JTA
transaction manager that uses XA data sources. IMO you can close this issue as
won't fix because, as you said, its a lot of work to support XA natively and
I'm not convinced now that there would be any benefit.
Original comment by David.H....@gmail.com
on 24 Mar 2014 at 2:37
Thanks for the update. Won't fix :)
Original comment by frederic...@gmail.com
on 25 Mar 2014 at 1:47
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
David.H....@gmail.com
on 19 Mar 2014 at 3:33