Closed kyriediculous closed 3 years ago
Totals | |
---|---|
Change from base Build 1137227852: | 1.0% |
Covered Lines: | 859 |
Relevant Lines: | 865 |
I think coverage is down because the refunder test is removed but the contract is still present , shall I add a commit to remove the refunder ? I mean it wasn't being used in streamflow either.
This branch resolves a merge conflict between streamflow and next
Would an alternative have been to cherry pick the conflicting commit (I think this one) into next
right before the recent hardhat/TS/yarn related commits so that next
could be cleanly merged into streamflow
by sharing the same Git history prior to the recent hardhat/TS/yarn related commits?
I think coverage is down because the refunder test is removed but the contract is still present , shall I add a commit to remove the refunder ? I mean it wasn't being used in streamflow either.
The Refunder contract is a part of the the contract system on mainnet right now (ref) since it was used to refund deposits from the pre-Streamflow JobsManager contract during the Streamflow upgrade. I'd be inclined to leave it for now so that the state of the streamflow
branch can continue to reflect what is deployed on mainnet - would it be possible to add back the test for the Refunder contract?
next
branch is protected , you can not force push to it so cherry picking is not an option AFAIK
next
branch is protected , you can not force push to it so cherry picking is not an option AFAIK
What about merging your nv/next
branch (which presumably was rebased off of streamflow
with the conflicts resolved) into next
via PR to line up the history on next
with streamflow
and then merge next
into streamflow
via PR?
I changed the base to next
, I'll look at the refunder test
@kautukkundan will add the refunder test in a separate PR
Resolved merge conflicts
What does this pull request do? Explain your changes. (required) Merge next into streamflow. This branch resolves a merge conflict between
streamflow
andnext