lizzieinvancouver / egret

1 stars 0 forks source link

clean chemical #65

Open lizzieinvancouver opened 1 month ago

lizzieinvancouver commented 1 month ago

@wangxm-forest I think you did most of the chemical cleaning but I am starting an issue as we have some more problems ... from issue #23 @kengi-neer wrote:

However, I did find some of the response values for airi2009 to be mismatched. Some chilling response values were actually KNO3 chemical treatment response values. I did not change them in my script as I think these, along with the previously mentioned cases of response variable and value mismatch, are better cleaned together.

Can you fix this?

Also, spread the word that we should start issues for each column we're cleaning as there is too much in issue #14

kengi-neer commented 1 month ago

@lizzieinvancouver @wangxm-forest Just to add, the indicated treatment is chilling but the response values did not match. I think this might have come about from data scraping because all other details seem to be fine except for the response value.

wangxm-forest commented 1 month ago

@lizzieinvancouver @kengi-neer I have checked the original paper and noticed that some data was entered incorrectly. Should I correct it in the original data scraping file?

lizzieinvancouver commented 4 days ago

@wangxm-forest If you do not think you can/should clean it in R you can check the rules about changing files here ... if you have questions, please ask @DeirdreLoughnan . Thank you!