Closed alanaroseo closed 10 months ago
That's a really interesting. I actually didn't record this on my mind as I was reading them but I guess it wouldn't be a huge amount of work to add? (do we have an idea of how many many are unclear about this?)
@alanaroseo Great idea! One hiccup could be studies that include both ... I bet @jannekehrl has some so will aim to discuss today.
Okay, discussion of this on Monday suggested it's a good metric, but would be better just to add it in R (versus updating files at all). Here's all the papers:
> sort(unique(dall$paper_id))
[1] "Brand2022" "bruening2017" "buermann2018" "Camarero2022"
[5] "Chen1998" "Chen2000" "cufar2014" "Cuny2012"
[9] "delpierre2017" "desauvage2022" "dow2022" "Drew & Downes 2018"
[13] "eckes-shephard2020" "Etzold2021" "Finzi2020" "francon2020"
[17] "Gao2022" "grossiord2022" "Keenan et al 2014" "kolar2016"
[21] "mckown2016" "michelot2012" "Moser2019" "Oddi2022"
[25] "Ren2019" "Richardson2020" "Sebastian-Azcona2020" "Silvestro2023"
[29] "Soolananayakanahally2013" "Soolananayakanahally2014" "Stridbeck2022" "Vitasse2009"
[33] "wheeler2016" "Zani2020" "Zhang2021" "Zhu2021"
[37] "Zohner2020" "Zohnerpreprint"
The following are greenhouse:
dall$paper_id[grep("greenhouse", dall$study_type)] [1] "Zani2020" "Zohnerpreprint" "Soolananayakanahally2013" "mckown2016"
[5] "mckown2016" "mckown2016" "grossiord2022"
@jannekehrl @AileneKane @alanaroseo @cchambe12 -- could you tell me the vague age (seedling/sapling/??) of these? And any other rows that might be juveniles?
@rdmanzanedo @FrederikBaumgarten Any non-adults in your studies?
@lizzieinvancouver For McKown2016, it says individuals were planted as "young trees" in 2008 and then monitored in 2012 - so maybe saplings?
Soolananayakanahally2013 is saplings or seedlings they are vague about that but I bet small because they did biomass
grossiord2022 is mine: they planted out 2-year old individuals (in the big outdoor chambers at WSL) in winter 2018 and started the experiment in 2019.
I feel like we should just have 'adult' and 'juvenile' as categories since most papers seem wishy-washy.
@jannekehrl or @AileneKane Can you update for "Zani2020" "Zohnerpreprint" ? I suspect it may depend on which row, so feel free to specify based on values in some other column. Thanks.
@kavs-P Hoping you can help with this! Though, please, check I think @alanaroseo may have done some of this already....
@alanaroseo Mine's and Freddi's seem ok except for sebastian-azcona2020, which is classsified as juveniles but, as far as I understand, it's 39 year old picea trees (I guess those are already reproductive and adults despite being rather young). Worth changing?
@alanaroseo sorry for the delay on this! for 1 experiment, they used "5-yr-old individuals of European beech (Fagus sylvatica) and Japanese meadowsweet (Spiraea japonica)" and experiment 2 was 2-yr-old individuals of silver birch (Betula pendula).
Here's the current update:
> d[,c("paper_id", "age_class"),]
paper_id age_class
1 brand2022 adult
2 bruening2017 <NA>
3 buermann2018 adult
4 camarero2022 adult
5 chen1998 adult
6 chen1998 adult
7 chen2000 <NA>
8 cufar2014 adult
9 cuny2012 adult
10 delpierre2017 adult
11 delpierre2017 adult
12 desauvage2022 adult
13 dow2022 adult
14 dow2022 adult
15 drew & downes 2018 adult
16 eckes-shephard2020 adult
17 etzold2021 adult
18 etzold2021 adult
19 finzi2020 adult
20 finzi2020 adult
21 francon2020 adult
22 gao2022 adult
23 gao2022 adult
24 grossiord2022 juvenile
25 keenan et al 2014 adult
26 kolar2016 adult
27 mckown2016 juvenile
28 mckown2016 juvenile
29 mckown2016 juvenile
30 michelot2012 adult
31 michelot2012 adult
32 moser2019 adult
33 oddi2022 adult
34 oddi2022 adult
35 ren2019 adult
36 richardson2020 <NA>
37 richardson2020 <NA>
38 richardson2020 <NA>
39 sebastian-azcona2020 adult
40 silvestro2023 adult
41 silvestro2023 adult
42 soolananayakanahally2013 juvenile
43 soolananayakanahally2013 juvenile
44 soolananayakanahally2013 juvenile
45 stridbeck2022 adult
46 stridbeck2022 adult
47 vitasse2009 juvenile
48 wheeler2016 adult
49 zani2020 adult
50 zani2020 adult
51 zani2020 juvenile
52 zhang2021 adult
53 zhu2021 adult
54 zhu2021 adult
55 zohner2020 <NA>
56 zohner2023 adult
57 zohner2023 adult
58 zohner2023 adult
59 zohner2023 adult
60 zohner2023 juvenile
I closing for now. If we end up needing this more, we can return to it to fix the NA or such.
Thank you @alanaroseo for all your help!
Hey @ALL, From what I can tell, exogenous factors are more likely to be found for adult trees. But some studies are not quite clear if adults or saplings. I can add a column and then you can agree or disagree, but it might be simpler if you add them yourself if you have not yet sent Lizzie your "authors_looked" updates (Issue #11 ) Yes? No?