lizzieinvancouver / grephon

0 stars 1 forks source link

finalizing figures #39

Closed lizzieinvancouver closed 1 month ago

lizzieinvancouver commented 4 months ago

Move tree growth x elevation figure to supp AND do the following (@lizzieinvancouver will work on getting this done):

  1. Drop Rainier
  2. Add ggplot slopes intervals of 89% (and test 50%). Make sure lines only extend to X axis of data.
  3. Add details on where (geograpgically data come from and what exact measurements were reported; for example are these values across several years per dot, several trees per dot, etc)
  4. Add better legend.

For the temperature response curve figure ... @kavs-P said: Fig 4. The power of this figure is the mechanistic side of things and I’d be kinda sad to see it go. I think it’s less integrated than some other figures with the text for sure but if one of our arguments is that we need to rethink how we approach Grephon studies by going across disciplines then having a figure like this showing a physiological perspective seems important. As in, if the goal is to get all of these different but related disciplines to speak to one another then having a neat little figure like this would be really helpful (I would appreciate seeing it as a reader). But I agree that in its current state it’s disconnected from the text and changing the phrasing in the figure would definitely help some. Also looking back at it now, there seems to be things we should be doing design-wise like making it more legible, maybe sticking with the same color story as the other figures, etc ( happy to help with this if we end up keeping the figure but needing to make changes). I wonder if we could connect this figure better to figure 1? I’m thinking that this figure gives the basis of the information that 1 is built on but makes the physiological stuff more explicit for temp at least. If we think that making this physiological stuff explicit is not necessary for this paper then we could remove it. But at the same time, having all of this information ( the physiological bits and the hypotheses together) seems like a valuable resource

@AileneKane @alanaroseo @cchambe12 and @lizzieinvancouver all like the curve, but could not come to consensus on how to edit it after meeting. Lots of discussion about what the relevant curves should be for thinking about growth and how moisture may affect that curve.

lizzieinvancouver commented 1 month ago

I updated the figure based on two curves I found... One is shown in issue #1 from Larcher book (12 April 2024 post to issue) and one is generalized from Fig 2a of Rezende & Bozinovic (Thermal performance across levels of biological organization).

drafttempfig

Also, I added the requested fixes to the elevation figure in issue #24 .