search

lizzieinvancouver / ospree

Budbreak review paper database
3 stars 0 forks source link

Concept figure #412

Open dbuona opened 3 years ago

dbuona commented 3 years ago

@dbuona will lay some ground work or draw an idea for a conceptual figure and @MoralesCastilla will make it better.

dbuona commented 3 years ago

I haven't mad much of a change to work on this.. I will try to get something rough off the ground in the next few days but if not it might have to wait until I am back from baby land. Appologies.

dbuona commented 3 years ago

just kidding... I made one here it should be rotated. My though was we could use a base map like those in EU_vs_NAm_sds.pdf and high like a port of the range with high vs. low variability . happy to answer any question you have, but feel free to take the idea and change it as you see fit!

MoralesCastilla commented 2 years ago

@dbuona Here is a first (not great) attempt at drafting the concept figure. Many things to change/improve, but a first step to get feedback and see what others have in mind. Things to consider changing are:

lizzieinvancouver commented 2 years ago

@MoralesCastilla This figure is amazing! Especially (and no offense @dbuona) to get from this figure to this fancy figure.

@DeirdreLoughnan @legault and me chatted this afternoon and we thought:

I think @dbuona would have a good perspective on this along with @cchambe12, but we wanted to check that min C works? I think we could do Min C, or do one that maps to a model or do Min C and wait to see what Ben Cook thinks? As in maybe that's a good general metric that bridges across GDD, chill portions etc.?

lizzieinvancouver commented 2 years ago

@MoralesCastilla Sorry I forgot to pick this up before the meeting ran long! It seems like you were on a good track, but let us know if you want to discuss.

@dbuona Maybe some deadlines would be good? I'd be happy to look at an outline whenever, but once the concept figure is drafted could be good too. Let us know what you think and @MoralesCastilla let us know you're schedule. I will also send this in an email just now.

MoralesCastilla commented 2 years ago

@dbuona and all, please see a new version of the concept figure here. Probably still a few tweaks to make. If this one works (more or less) I can make similar versions with other variables for the Supplement. A question I still have is, perhaps we should make a different choice of species? I guess it should not matter much as our focus is not to compare pairs of species but the figure aims at illustrating the different sources of temporal/spatial variation in a given climate dimension within example species' ranges. Anyways, any feedback is super welcome.

dbuona commented 2 years ago

@MoralesCastilla I think it looks really good. The Bayes group discussed it a bit and we have two suggestions.

  1. Would it be possible to use Fagus sylvatica instead of Abies alba? They seem to have similar ranges but we wondering if people might feel more comfortable with the comparison to F. grandifolia if the species are closer related.
  2. Could you change the colors of the range and insets? The green and purple seem like they're on a similar palette to the climate maps and people might try to interpret them that way. Other than that, I think this figure is perfect for illustrating all the points we want, and it looks great too!
lizzieinvancouver commented 2 years ago

@MoralesCastilla Just to add, belatedly... We loved it! We also agreed we trust your judgement if you cannot come up with better colors.