I tasked this to myself as I realized how out of the loop I am on pheno phylo ... I did some ISI searches today, looking for:
Papers on phenologic* AND phylogen* (over 1000)
Papers on phenologic* AND phylogen* AND temperature sensitiv* (about 100)
Papers on phenologic* AND phylogen* AND animal* (about 120)
Here are some refs to consider including (I am adding them to the bib):
A 2010 classic, "The importance of phylogeny to the study of phenological response to global climate change"
A 1995 classic, "Phylogenetic patterns among tropical flowering phenologies"
A good citation on animals, "Temporal shifts and temperature sensitivity of avian spring migratory phenology: a phylogenetic meta-analysis"
This paper purports to be the first to look at signal in response to climate change (but I think Willis deserves that credit from 7 years earlier than this paper?), "Phylogenetic conservatism and trait correlates of spring phenological responses to climate change in northeast China"
This counts both for molecular and for animals, "A cross-taxonomic perspective on the integration of temperature cues in vertebrate seasonal neuroendocrine pathways"
Although photoperiod is the dominant cue used to trigger seasonal physiology or entrain circannual clocks, across birds, mammals, fish, reptiles and amphibians, seasonality appears to be temperature sensitive and in at least some cases this appears to be related to phylogenetically conserved TH signaling in the hypothalamus.
A paper on temperature sensitivity (sort of a bear and way too many tests in one paper, but it's what we have), "Phylogenetic conservatism in heat requirement of leaf-out phenology, rather than temperature sensitivity, in Tibetan Plateau"
We showed that leaf unfolding date and its sensitivities to daily mean, minimum and maximum temperatures did not exhibit overall significant phylogenetic signals. Moreover, the sensitivity of leaf unfolding date to daily minimum temperature exhibited phylogenetic antisignal at species level, which indicated the trait difference among close relatives exceed that among distantly related lineages. However, there were overall significant phylogenetic signals in growing-degree-days and the average level of each of daily mean, minimum and maximum temperatures experienced by plants before leaf unfolding date. ...
A Brad Hawkins paper came up! "Community phylogenetics at the biogeographical scale: cold tolerance, niche conservatism and the structure of North American forests"
Additionally, lots of papers use PGLS, but don't focus on it including ...
"Predicting the sensitivity of butterfly phenology to temperature over the past century"
"Temperature-dependent shifts in phenology contribute to the success of exotic species with climate change" ... and I bet a ton of other papers on this topic
This is not relevant for us, but here's a paper saying tagging is not good for birds (one of my personal complaints to bird researchers)! "Weak effects of geolocators on small birds: A meta-analysis controlled for phylogeny and publication bias" (and I am betting reviewers made them change the title to 'weak effects').
Even though the effects were not statistically significant in phylogenetically controlled models, we found a weak negative impact of geolocators on apparent survival. The negative effect on apparent survival was stronger with increasing relative load of the device and with geolocators attached using elastic harnesses. Moreover, tagging effects were stronger in smaller species. In conclusion, we found a weak effect on apparent survival of tagged birds and managed to pinpoint key aspects and drivers of tagging effects.
I tasked this to myself as I realized how out of the loop I am on pheno phylo ... I did some ISI searches today, looking for:
phenologic* AND phylogen*(over 1000)phenologic* AND phylogen* AND temperature sensitiv*(about 100)phenologic* AND phylogen* AND animal*(about 120)Here are some refs to consider including (I am adding them to the bib):
A 2010 classic, "The importance of phylogeny to the study of phenological response to global climate change"
A 1995 classic, "Phylogenetic patterns among tropical flowering phenologies"
A good citation on animals, "Temporal shifts and temperature sensitivity of avian spring migratory phenology: a phylogenetic meta-analysis"
This paper purports to be the first to look at signal in response to climate change (but I think Willis deserves that credit from 7 years earlier than this paper?), "Phylogenetic conservatism and trait correlates of spring phenological responses to climate change in northeast China"
This counts both for molecular and for animals, "A cross-taxonomic perspective on the integration of temperature cues in vertebrate seasonal neuroendocrine pathways"
A paper on temperature sensitivity (sort of a bear and way too many tests in one paper, but it's what we have), "Phylogenetic conservatism in heat requirement of leaf-out phenology, rather than temperature sensitivity, in Tibetan Plateau"
Additionally, lots of papers use PGLS, but don't focus on it including ...
This is not relevant for us, but here's a paper saying tagging is not good for birds (one of my personal complaints to bird researchers)! "Weak effects of geolocators on small birds: A meta-analysis controlled for phylogeny and publication bias" (and I am betting reviewers made them change the title to 'weak effects').