search

lizzieinvancouver / temporalvar

0 stars 0 forks source link

show that tracking is a 'better' strategy under non-stationary #35

Closed lizzieinvancouver closed 5 years ago

lizzieinvancouver commented 5 years ago

(1) Count all species lost under non-stationary ... and calculate average tracking value of those? Compare both to the respective numbers before non-stationary began.

(2) Also.. note that in alphaRstar.runs.alpha.rstar2p.pdf -- bottom panel: yellow is favored in upper-right corner which is where yellow is better tracker, purple is favored in lower left, where purple is the better tracker.

lizzieinvancouver commented 5 years ago

@donahuem Runs with tracking double the remaining species percentage after nonstationary (i.e., 50% left after non-stationary versus 27%) and average tracking value of existing species goes up a bit after non-stationary ... 0.73 vs. 0.77 0.72 vs. 0.76 0.72 vs. 0.76 These numbers will probably go up once we have bfin data and can exclude a few species headed for extinctions.