Instead of individual star selection use a check box to select the common ones.
I can rearrange them. So for the extra choice box, what behaviour do you want if someone selects it? If someone selects the OBAFG…, then do you want to sects a search with all of them.
YES. JUST THAT ROW. IN THAT WAY, SEARCHES CAN BE RESTRICTED TO MAJOR/TRUE STARS. WHICH IN TURN, REDUCES THE NUMBER TO CHECK DURING ROUTE CALCULATION.
ALSO, THE CHECK ROW BOX ALSO CHECKS EACH OF THE INDIVIDUAL STELLAR TYPES, AND THEN THE USER CAN REDUCE (IE, UNCHECKING M CLASS = A REDUCTION OF 80%+ OF STELLAR OBJECTS)
And if someone selects the second checkbox does that mean that you want the to select all the secondary spectra?
YES. SAME RULES.
For run query, let me know when you have a better word or phrase.
Instead of individual star selection use a check box to select the common ones.
I can rearrange them. So for the extra choice box, what behaviour do you want if someone selects it? If someone selects the OBAFG…, then do you want to sects a search with all of them.
YES. JUST THAT ROW. IN THAT WAY, SEARCHES CAN BE RESTRICTED TO MAJOR/TRUE STARS. WHICH IN TURN, REDUCES THE NUMBER TO CHECK DURING ROUTE CALCULATION.
ALSO, THE CHECK ROW BOX ALSO CHECKS EACH OF THE INDIVIDUAL STELLAR TYPES, AND THEN THE USER CAN REDUCE (IE, UNCHECKING M CLASS = A REDUCTION OF 80%+ OF STELLAR OBJECTS)
And if someone selects the second checkbox does that mean that you want the to select all the secondary spectra?
YES. SAME RULES.
For run query, let me know when you have a better word or phrase.
LET'S THROW THAT OUT TO THE GROUP PAGE.