Open RobinGuillard opened 3 years ago
After more scrutiny, I remarked that this weird behaviour also happened for 1RF29 and 1PA31, despite their data being of great quality.
Case solved ! It was because we were not selecting the good channels in data_info : chans 6 and 7 instead of 4 and 5.
Despite correcting for better impedance value (15000 ohms) for 3NS01, there seems to still be a problem in bruxism processing for 3NS01_cohort2.edf. It needs to be addressed as the data on the recording seem to be of good quality.