Closed lkorczowski closed 4 years ago
Check out this pull request on
Review Jupyter notebook visual diffs & provide feedback on notebooks.
Powered by ReviewNB
Merging #67 into master will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #67 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 12 12
Lines 597 636 +39
=========================================
+ Hits 597 636 +39
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
tinnsleep/events/burst.py | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
tinnsleep/classification.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
tinnsleep/events/__init__.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
tinnsleep/events/episode.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
tinnsleep/events/scoring.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
tinnsleep/reports.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
tinnsleep/signal.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
tinnsleep/utils.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6486a19...6486a19. Read the comment docs.
just for fun on np.random.randn(20, 40000)
Impedance_thresholding_sliding time execution: 4.82ms
AmplitudeThresholding (including epoching) time execution: 0.53ms
10 times faster
on np.random.randn(200, 400000)
Impedance_thresholding_sliding time execution: 717ms
AmplitudeThresholding (including epoching) time execution: 45ms
yep, still 10 times faster
other refactors
closes #71 closes #74 closes #70