Closed solardiz closed 1 year ago
@0xC0ncord @vt-alt @wladmis It'd be great if you could test this on kernels/systems where these changes actually matter, however if that's difficult for you that's also fine - we can just assume everything's hopefully right, and release soon, and see.
It'd be great if you could test this on kernels/systems where these changes actually matter
So far 6f3627e32cf36dda8ff160c2fe31592f6537845d is working fine on 5.15.55!
Bug with 5.10.133 was found by ALT QA and it would be not easy for me to reproduce their workflows (also this would require to produce a package which is not maintained by me). So,..
Description
This takes care of the jump label change backport to 5.10.133+ and hopefully would also take care of potential backports of that change to even older branches. While at it, also increase severity of alerts from
CRIT
toEMERG
.How Has This Been Tested?
CI on my fork shows 16 successful, 1 in progress. Also installed on an old system (without the variable length jump labels).