feat: change `setRolePermission` parameter from hash to permission data tuple

[AustinGreen]

Motivation:

The function signature for assigning a permission to a role was function setRolePermission(uint8 role, bytes32 permissionId, bool hasPermission). This worked nicely because it means the policy does not need to know about the PermissionData struct. The issue was that this made it complicated for offchain infrastructure to derive the (target, selector, strategy) tuple that's the pre-image of the permissionId.

We decided to change it to function setRolePermission(uint8 role, PermissionData memory permissionData, bool hasPermission) to address this concern.

Modifications:

• Updated setRolePermission and _setRolePermission to accept a permissionData parameter
• Update RolePermissionAssigned event to emit both the permissionId and the permissionData tuple
• Pass the bootstrapPermissionData instead of bootstrapPermissionID to the policy initialization
• Update the deployLlamaInstance.json input file to pass a permissionDataInput struct instead of the permission hash.
• Update the test suite to reflect this change
• Add a test using recordLogs to ensure event data is emitted correctly

Result:

Offchain infrastructure will be able to easily maintain mappings between (target, selector, strategy) tuples and permissionIds

[github-actions[bot]]

Coverage after merging austin/change-set-role-permission into main will be

83.93%

Coverage Report

File	Stmts	Branches	Funcs	Lines	Uncovered Lines
src
LlamaCore.sol	99.26%	97.30%	100%	100%	292, 393
LlamaExecutor.sol	80%	50%	100%	100%	33
LlamaFactory.sol	100%	100%	100%	100%
LlamaLens.sol	72.09%	20%	100%	82.61%	175–176, 179, 179, 179–180, 180, 180–181, 181, 181, 189
LlamaPolicy.sol	91.49%	88.89%	94.59%	91.30%	324, 361, 361, 361–363, 363, 363, 365–368, 370, 383
LlamaPolicyMetadata.sol	100%	100%	100%	100%
src/accounts
LlamaAccount.sol	100%	100%	100%	100%
src/lib
ERC721NonTransferableMinimalProxy.sol	70.42%	72.73%	72.73%	68.42%	102, 104, 106, 118–120, 190, 88, 88, 88, 90, 90, 90, 92, 92, 92, 97, 99
LlamaUtils.sol	100%	100%	100%	100%
PolicyholderCheckpoints.sol	55.88%	50%	81.82%	53.62%	125, 179–181, 181, 181–182, 184, 187, 217, 224, 224–226, 228, 228–230, 232, 232–234, 236, 236–238, 257, 260–266, 273, 46, 46–48, 48, 48–49, 51
SupplyCheckpoints.sol	57.14%	50%	83.33%	54.93%	131, 183–185, 185, 185–186, 188, 191, 235, 242, 242–244, 246, 246–248, 250, 250–252, 254, 254–256, 275, 278–284, 291, 50, 50–52, 52, 52–53, 55
src/llama-scripts
LlamaGovernanceScript.sol	50%	33.33%	43.75%	53.45%	106–108, 115–117, 125–128, 135–137, 146–150, 157–158, 166–168, 67, 74, 74, 76, 89–90, 97–98
src/strategies/absolute
LlamaAbsolutePeerReview.sol	100%	100%	100%	100%
LlamaAbsoluteQuorum.sol	100%	100%	100%	100%
LlamaAbsoluteStrategyBase.sol	94.74%	87.50%	90.91%	97.96%	238, 241, 289
src/strategies/relative
LlamaRelativeHolderQuorum.sol	91.67%	75%	100%	100%	46, 53
LlamaRelativeQuantityQuorum.sol	0%	0%	0%	0%	26, 26, 26–28, 38, 38, 38–40, 45–46, 46, 46–47, 52–53, 53, 53–54
LlamaRelativeStrategyBase.sol	97.59%	90.91%	100%	100%	203, 303
LlamaRelativeUniqueHolderQuorum.sol	93.33%	83.33%	100%	100%	48, 55