Open parteekcoder opened 1 year ago
also there are some eslint errors I will remove them
hi @llaske @NikhilM98 please guide me, I will make code more optimized but I want to know if it is to be done in the way I implemented
currently I implemented 2 tests, whose outputs are coming correct as expected
I know first I need to add a fakeuser to test login page , but now I just want to show what I have implemented
I will first add a fakeuser and update this PR
Good job! This PR looks good as the first step towards selenium testing. I'll update you about the scope of the Selenium testing soon.
Good job! This PR looks good as the first step towards selenium testing. I'll update you about the scope of the Selenium testing soon.
@NikhilM98 thanks for the review, should write some more test
Good job! This PR looks good as the first step towards selenium testing. I'll update you about the scope of the Selenium testing soon.
Hey @NikhilM98 you are telling about some selenium testing scope , what is that
The idea is to have functional testing to complement unit testing. The selenium tests should test the the features of each view.
For example (for Users view): testing "if the users are correctly listed in the users view", "does searching, sorting, and filtering on the users view works as expected", "does the users form successfully creates a new user", "are the details of the created user correct in the edit user view", etc.
The idea is to have functional testing to complement unit testing. The selenium tests should test the the features of each view.
For example (for Users view): testing "if the users are correctly listed in the users view", "does searching, sorting, and filtering on the users view works as expected", "does the users form successfully creates a new user", "are the details of the created user correct in the edit user view", etc.
yeah sure @NikhilM98 I will work upon this
I've fixed a specific issue on Linux and published a branch here https://github.com/llaske/sugarizer-server/tree/feature/selenium
I've fixed a specific issue on Linux and published a branch here https://github.com/llaske/sugarizer-server/tree/feature/selenium
Thanks @llaske , please may I know the issue on Linux. So that in Future I also consider that while making PR
@llaske I checked that branch and understood the issue. Thanks for fixing this.
@llaske @NikhilM98
398
First step towards selenium testing for sugarizer-server
I would like your suggestions and work upon, now it is just a initial step I will refactor the code to the best possible approch