[X] I have searched the existing issues and checked the recent builds/commits
What would your feature do ?
Chainner (https://github.com/chaiNNer-org/chaiNNer) is a node processing gui that allows complex workflows and can be linked with A1111 to perform certain steps. However, SD forge API must be somewhat different since chainner manages to detect it; but not to obtain a valid response.
I made the same request in chainner (https://github.com/chaiNNer-org/chaiNNer/issues/2839 but when asked about the API, I couldn't answer anything since I am not an expert.
I think compatibility can be achieved with minimal effort in this case since it is only a miscomunication between both programs.
If someone with the know-how about the SD forge API can post in the chainner issue, it could help bring this feature to light in future versions.
Is there an existing issue for this?
What would your feature do ?
Chainner (https://github.com/chaiNNer-org/chaiNNer) is a node processing gui that allows complex workflows and can be linked with A1111 to perform certain steps. However, SD forge API must be somewhat different since chainner manages to detect it; but not to obtain a valid response. I made the same request in chainner (https://github.com/chaiNNer-org/chaiNNer/issues/2839 but when asked about the API, I couldn't answer anything since I am not an expert. I think compatibility can be achieved with minimal effort in this case since it is only a miscomunication between both programs.
If someone with the know-how about the SD forge API can post in the chainner issue, it could help bring this feature to light in future versions.
Proposed workflow
Additional information
No response