Open escherle-validas opened 1 day ago
Just to note that again the analysis is looking past the logical-NOT as simplistic and focusing on the containing Boolean expression. It states the boundaries of the region it is analyzing:
MC/DC Decision Region (24:10) to (24:18)
Which includes (v0&&v1). The analysis is correct for this region, it's just that the negation is not included. I know your assertion is that it should be.
Criticality: HIGH During qualification of MCDC coverage at Validas we found that In the following example the term “(!(v0 && v1))” is not evaluated correctly. We observed that the expected results are wrongly computed in the test vector line, for example v0=T, v1=T the expected result should be F but is compouted to T
This is confusing, since other terms like (v0 && (v1 || v2)) and ((v0 && v1) || v2)) are evaluated correctly.