I asked our university's IT staff to install a current version of clang/clang++ on one of our machines. He installed 3.4, but was forced to include this snarky wrapper for using it (he told me I could include the snark! Please don't shoot the messenger!):
#!/bin/bash
# clang's build environment does not obey LD_RUN_PATH, so have to use
# this workaround at run time. D41S, argh!
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/sup/lib64:/usr/sup/lib:/lib64:/usr/lib64:/lib:/usr/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH export LD_LIBRARY_PATH
# At least clang itself obeys LD_RUN_PATH, set it to prevent screwy errors
# later.
LD_RUN_PATH=/usr/sup/lib64:/usr/sup/lib:/lib64:/usr/lib64:/lib:/usr/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH export LD_RUN_PATH
# clang does not retain the environment it was built under, so have to use
# this workaround at run time. D41S, argh!
CPATH=/usr/sup/include:/usr/sup/include/c++/4.8.0:CPATH export CPATH
LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/sup/lib64:/usr/sup/lib:/lib64:/usr/lib64:/lib:/usr/lib:$LIBRARY_PATH export LIBRARY_PATH
# Now that we've worked around most of the stupid, invoke clang++ with
# the invocation that takes care of the rest of the stupid.
/usr/sup/llvm-3.4/bin/clang++ -I/usr/sup/include -I/usr/sup/include/c++/4.8.0 $*
Other possibly relevant information:
$ which clang++
/usr/sup/bin/clang++
$ clang++ --version
clang version 3.4 (tags/RELEASE_34/final)
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.5 (Santiago)
Our IT staff puts a lot of stuff in the /usr/sup/bin directory, and it seems to me that this is what is causing the headache.
If this isn't a bug, I'd like to pass on to the IT guy what could be done to remedy this without the wrapper.
| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [18601](https://llvm.org/bz18601) |
| Version | unspecified |
| OS | Linux |
| Reporter | LLVM Bugzilla Contributor |
## Extended Description
I asked our university's IT staff to install a current version of clang/clang++ on one of our machines. He installed 3.4, but was forced to include this snarky wrapper for using it (he told me I could include the snark! Please don't shoot the messenger!):
```bash
#!/bin/bash
# clang's build environment does not obey LD_RUN_PATH, so have to use
# this workaround at run time. D41S, argh!
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/sup/lib64:/usr/sup/lib:/lib64:/usr/lib64:/lib:/usr/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH export LD_LIBRARY_PATH
# At least clang itself obeys LD_RUN_PATH, set it to prevent screwy errors
# later.
LD_RUN_PATH=/usr/sup/lib64:/usr/sup/lib:/lib64:/usr/lib64:/lib:/usr/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH export LD_RUN_PATH
# clang does not retain the environment it was built under, so have to use
# this workaround at run time. D41S, argh!
CPATH=/usr/sup/include:/usr/sup/include/c++/4.8.0:CPATH export CPATH
LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/sup/lib64:/usr/sup/lib:/lib64:/usr/lib64:/lib:/usr/lib:$LIBRARY_PATH export LIBRARY_PATH
# Now that we've worked around most of the stupid, invoke clang++ with
# the invocation that takes care of the rest of the stupid.
/usr/sup/llvm-3.4/bin/clang++ -I/usr/sup/include -I/usr/sup/include/c++/4.8.0 $*
```
Other possibly relevant information:
```console
$ which clang++
/usr/sup/bin/clang++
$ clang++ --version
clang version 3.4 (tags/RELEASE_34/final)
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.5 (Santiago)
```
Our IT staff puts a lot of stuff in the `/usr/sup/bin` directory, and it seems to me that this is what is causing the headache.
If this isn't a bug, I'd like to pass on to the IT guy what could be done to remedy this without the wrapper.
Extended Description
I asked our university's IT staff to install a current version of clang/clang++ on one of our machines. He installed 3.4, but was forced to include this snarky wrapper for using it (he told me I could include the snark! Please don't shoot the messenger!):
Other possibly relevant information:
Our IT staff puts a lot of stuff in the
/usr/sup/bin
directory, and it seems to me that this is what is causing the headache.If this isn't a bug, I'd like to pass on to the IT guy what could be done to remedy this without the wrapper.