llvm / llvm-project

The LLVM Project is a collection of modular and reusable compiler and toolchain technologies.
http://llvm.org
Other
28.22k stars 11.65k forks source link

Thread safety analysis incorrectly warns when using `std::scoped_lock` with multiple locks #42000

Open GodTamIt opened 5 years ago

GodTamIt commented 5 years ago
Bugzilla Link 42655
Version trunk
OS All
CC @AaronBallman,@aaronpuchert,@zygoloid,@frobtech

Extended Description

Example: https://godbolt.org/z/d3qZS6

When using the std::scoped_lock constructor to acquire multiple locks, thread safety analysis seems to think none of the locks are taken in the ensuing block.

AaronBallman commented 2 years ago

I think that will need some changes to Clang, because we seem unable to parse a pack expression inside an attribute:

[...]/libcxx/test/libcxx/thread/thread.mutex/thread_safety_lock_guard.pass.cpp:20:
[...]/include/c++/v1/mutex:520:105: error: expected ')'
    explicit scoped_lock(_MArgs&... __margs) _LIBCPP_THREAD_SAFETY_ANNOTATION(acquire_capability(__margs...))
                                                                                                        ^
[...]/include/c++/v1/mutex:527:111: error: expected ')'
    scoped_lock(adopt_lock_t, _MArgs&... __margs) _LIBCPP_THREAD_SAFETY_ANNOTATION(requires_capability(__margs...))
                                                                                                              ^

@AaronBallman, any idea how hard that would be? Perhaps we would also need to teach template instantiation to look into these attributes?

We currently don't support any attribute parameter packs, so I suspect there's some effort to add here. It'd mostly be around the template instantiation logic to ensure we expand the parameter packs, but there may be some bits around parsing as well.

aaronpuchert commented 2 years ago

Strangely it parses without "...", but then template instantiation doesn't work:

CXXConstructorDecl scoped_lock<_MArgs...> 'void (_MArgs &...)'
|-ParmVarDecl 0x168e6a0 referenced __margs '_MArgs &...' pack
`-AcquireCapabilityAttr acquire_capability
  `-DeclRefExpr '_MArgs' lvalue ParmVar 0x168e6a0 '__margs' '_MArgs &...'
       non_odr_use_unevaluated

instantiated as:

CXXConstructorDecl used scoped_lock 'void (std::mutex &, std::mutex &)'
|-ParmVarDecl referenced __margs 'std::mutex &'
|-ParmVarDecl referenced __margs 'std::mutex &'
`-AcquireCapabilityAttr acquire_capability
  `-FunctionParmPackExpr '_MArgs' lvalue

So then we get warning: cannot resolve lock expression [-Wthread-safety-analysis], and the mutexes are not considered to be held.

Though template instantiation is not the actual issue here: since we have no ellipsis, there is nothing to expand.

aaronpuchert commented 2 years ago

I think that will need some changes to Clang, because we seem unable to parse a pack expression inside an attribute:

[...]/libcxx/test/libcxx/thread/thread.mutex/thread_safety_lock_guard.pass.cpp:20:
[...]/include/c++/v1/mutex:520:105: error: expected ')'
    explicit scoped_lock(_MArgs&... __margs) _LIBCPP_THREAD_SAFETY_ANNOTATION(acquire_capability(__margs...))
                                                                                                        ^
[...]/include/c++/v1/mutex:527:111: error: expected ')'
    scoped_lock(adopt_lock_t, _MArgs&... __margs) _LIBCPP_THREAD_SAFETY_ANNOTATION(requires_capability(__margs...))
                                                                                                              ^

@AaronBallman, any idea how hard that would be? Perhaps we would also need to teach template instantiation to look into these attributes?

frobtech commented 5 years ago

Petr has a change in progress for this.

GodTamIt commented 5 years ago

assigned to @petrhosek

AaronBallman commented 1 year ago

This should be a bit easier to now because we added support for this recently: ead1690d31f815c00fdd2bc23db4766191bbeabc