llvmbot
commented
5 years ago Discussion from llvm-dev mailing lists about this issue:
Reply from Nema, Ashutosh
""" Seems like when you comment out a loop in “compute” function, it gets inlined, this helps LV by finding the bounds and vectorizes it.
With the presence of all the loops LAA is not able to identify the bounds for the accesses:
LAA: Can't find bounds for ptr: %arrayidx.i159 = getelementptr inbounds double, double* %30, i64 %and.i158, !dbg !46
LAA: Can't find bounds for ptr: %arrayidx.i155 = getelementptr inbounds double, double* %36, i64 %and.i154, !dbg !66
LAA: Can't find bounds for ptr: %arrayidx.i151 = getelementptr inbounds double, double* %42, i64 %and.i150, !dbg !91
Its bit strange as its able to identify the bounds correctly for the first loop.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Reply from Michael Kruse
""" There is some weird interaction between alias-analysis and the vectorized code. For the first loop, alias-analysis is able to determine that "output" is not aliasing with the read-only arrays:
LAA: Processing memory accesses... AST: Alias Set Tracker: 2 alias sets for 7 pointer values. AliasSet[0x16a131c3120, 1] must alias, No access Pointers: (double %arrayidx6, unknown) AliasSet[0x16a131c1e90, 6] may alias, No access Pointers: (double %arrayidx, unknown), (double* %arrayidx1, unknown), (double* %_pointer.i, unknown), (i64 %_mask.i, unknown), (double %arrayidx.i, unknown), (double %arrayidx5, unknown)
After vectorizing the first loop, it is not able to do this anymore
(did not investigate the why). When trying to vectorize the second
loop, it requires a runtime condition to guard against aliasing (for
which it needs to determine the loop bounds), but is unable to do so
because of the the and-mask of "G"/BracketAdapterWithMask:
%arrayidx.i159 --- or as SCEV: ((8 * %and.i158)
When removing one of the for-loops, the entire compute-function is inlined into the run function and this problem is magically resolved. Not sure why.
Would you file a bug report?
Extended Description
Hello, could you please have a look at this code posted on godbolt.org: https://godbolt.org/z/O-O-Q7 (code also attached in case godbolt link breaks)
The problem is that inside the compute function, only the first loop vectorizes while the rest copies of it don't. But if I remove any of the for loops, then the rest vectorize successfully. The message "Cannot identify array bounds" is not helpful.