Open mysterymath opened 7 months ago
@llvm/issue-subscribers-lldb
Author: Daniel Thornburgh (mysterymath)
@MaskRay
Just saw your Fuchsia report. Since LLVM libunwind implements __register_frame_info
as an empty stub, and the test doesn't look like a statically linked executable, it strongly suggests to me that it might be an configuration problem on Fuchsia side, which I know nothing about.
Can you help investigate?
Ping @mysterymath : This looks like a Fuchsia configuration problem that should not block relanding #83201
Just saw your Fuchsia report. Since LLVM libunwind implements
__register_frame_info
as an empty stub, and the test doesn't look like a statically linked executable, it strongly suggests to me that it might be an configuration problem on Fuchsia side, which I know nothing about.
Sorry for dropping this one; does something specific suggest that the test isn't statically linked? IIRC the tests should build binaries using the clang built with the toolchain, and that clang is configured to statically link against compiler-rt.
PR #83201 produced a breakage in the LLDB test suite for AArch64 on a Fuchsia builder: https://luci-milo.appspot.com/ui/p/fuchsia/builders/toolchain.ci/clang-linux-arm64/b8754880571862677073/overview
The precise relationship between the two is unclear; it may be that the artifacts built during the LLDB test suite are built with a configuration that bucks the expectations of that PR.