Open 20urc3 opened 1 week ago
CC @MaskRay who may have more ideas here.
checking if ccache afl-clang-lto++ is -fvisibility-inlines-hidden safe (Clang bug 11250)... yes
But https://llvm.org/bz11250 is closed as invalid ages ago and I doubt it meant https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/11250
While looking around online, one thing I noticed was: https://bugs.gentoo.org/649666
LibreOffice is huge... Do you have a minimal code example where you suspect Clang's visibility rule is not ideal?
Our primary test is clang/test/CodeGenCXX/visibility.cpp
. Last year I added some interesting cases there.
@llvm/issue-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: None (20urc3)
Hi, trying to compile LibreOffice with (afl) clang I face this issue. From my understanding it's similar to this bug https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26905 and solely related to Clang. Any feedback?
(tagging @AaronBallman as instructed on LLVM's discord)
Cheers