lmu-osc / code-publishing

A minimal reproducible example for the workshop on Quarto manuscripts. Also includes a reproducibility checklist and instructions for creating your own workflow with your existing project.
https://lmu-osc.github.io/code-publishing/
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
0 stars 0 forks source link

feedback on first read #7

Open MalikaIhle opened 2 months ago

MalikaIhle commented 2 months ago

Project set up

Choose a licence

add read me

deployment

About

MalikaIhle commented 2 months ago

I suppose the read me file of this repo should also be revised?

MalikaIhle commented 2 months ago

can you also add an edit this page and report an issue button like we have on others? I think @NeuroShepherd could also do that

NeuroShepherd commented 2 months ago

I can take care of most of the edits to the yaml file

fkohrt commented 2 months ago

@MalikaIhle

note '4' on file path -> I'm not sure how to use it is images\result.png working or do I need to use file.path() somehow?

I have dropped that note, as I believe it is not that important.

you say the flow charts only suggest the most permissive licence - is there any resource in case they do not want to have the most permissive licence?

The advanced flowcharts provide more restrictive (i.e., copyleft) choices, and I have changed the text to explicitly say so.

fkohrt commented 2 months ago

add a sentence for why they need to install Tex and whether they are likely to use it again in the future

I have written the following now:

Also, you need to have a $\TeX$ distribution installed on your computer, which is used in the background to typeset PDF documents.

What do you think can I say about whether they are likely to use it again in the future?

fkohrt commented 2 months ago

there is a bug when I try to hover over Chacon and Straub (2024). -> it moves between the end of line and a new line making it unreadable and unclickable

Unfortunately, I cannot reproduce it. But I guess this should be raised at Quarto's repository anyways.

fkohrt commented 2 months ago

overall quite long, I'm not sure they'll read it all, but I know this topic is complex and we can't simplify it by risk of being incorrect... I need to think if there is a way they for sure read some parts we want them to read. but perhaps this is already done with the choice of boxes and extra figures.

I think I addressed this as part of #13