Open jainraj opened 6 months ago
Hi @jainraj,
The bounds with ddm_sdv
was indeed a bug that was fixed in this PR. However, this change has not yet made into an official release on PyPI yet. You can download the dev version of HSSM with this command pip install git+https://github.com/lnccbrown/HSSM.git
.
We'll look into the other bugs. There should be ddm_sdv.onnx on huggingface, so that one is a weird one :).
Thanks! Paul
Confirmed that the onnx model for ddm_sdv
was not uploaded to HuggingFace. @AlexanderFengler do you have a model that can be uploaded?
Any ETA on this?
HSSM version 0.2.0
To Reproduce
Bug 1: Bounds by default
Output:
I think this should be solved by using the right bounds variable in
defaults.py
- which I see has happened inmain
brain, but please confirm.Bug 2: So I proceeded to explicitly give the bounds, but.
Output:
Unsure what is causing this.
Bug 3: So I moved to
approx_differentiable
, but.Output:
I guess the compiled version from Huggingface was removed?
So I moved to
blackbox
likelihood, but for my actual use case, I have a hierarchical model fort
parameter and I am facing the same issue as #411, i.e., high r-hats for allt
parameters :(