Closed buddynohair closed 4 years ago
Hello,
I checked your architecture file. It is due to your binding lines
<pb_type name="blackbox.[adder].ble.adder">
The name follows the naming in vpr on the pb_type name in full hierarchy.
The format is as follows.
<pb_type_name>[<mode_name>].<sub_pb_type_name>[<mode_name>]
Therefore, the dot between blackbox
and [adder]
should not be there.
I believe that is the issue.
Hi, i delete the dot between blackbox and [adder] , but the issue still exists
Hello,
After checking your openfpga architecture XML, I see another problem.
You define the pb_type-to-circuit_model binding inside the <pb_type name="blackbox">
, which will be discarded by the parser.
As you can see in the examples, the binding should be defined under the <pb_type_annotation>
without any intermediate hierarchy.
Also, I think the debugging information may be too brief to help. Therefore I created a pull request where the full hierarchy path of a pb_type will be printed out when the binding errors out.
Hello, im still confused with the pb_type_annotation format. I simplify the block blackbox, now only with one adder module. I also change the binding line in the openfpga-arc as followings
But it still shows me the error pb_type "adder" missing circuit model binding.
Hello,
What you show here is not consistent with your XML file:
<pb_type name="blackbox[adder].ble.adder" circuit_model_name="adder"/>
When I change to this line to what you showed, OpenFPGA works.
Hello, thank you very much. I forgot to save the file before i ran the commend.
Hi,
this time i wrote a new custom block called "blackbox", which includes an adder and a flipflop module in the vpr-arch, and want to link it with the circuit model in the openfppa-arch. Unfortunately it shows me an error called "pb_type missing circuit binding". I checked pb_type annotation part with the tutorial and the examples you have given, but didn't find any problems. Can you please give me some advice?
xml.zip