Closed xresende closed 1 year ago
@fernandohds564 , @anacso17 , @murilobalves,
should we drop this set of excdata atualization PRs based on re-measurements or merge them ? we should try to decide on this ando not keep it indefinitely. In my opinion we could merge.
@fernandohds564 , @anacso17 , @murilobalves,
should we drop this set of excdata atualization PRs based on re-measurements or merge them ? we should try to decide on this ando not keep it indefinitely. In my opinion we could merge.
@xresende I don't remember the details anymore, but I think this PR was tested in the machine and the result was not as expected, so we decided to keep old rescaling factors and did not returned for optics studies with rescaling factor variation. In this case, I think we should close this PR.
maybe this one we could close, right?
maybe this one we could close, right?
I agree
@fernando, all files already had the original correction factors for all families. if you expand file lines you will see the table.