search

lnobad / lidgren-network-gen3

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/lidgren-network-gen3
0 stars 0 forks source link

loss packet no accept #36

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.add simulation loss code in server
2.run server
3.run client

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
server resend data to client, and client can process it.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
all version

Please provide any additional information below.
if client receive a packet not the ordered (lost one packet), and then it 
withhold it in a queue, this in ok. but when client receive the lost packet, 
client just add the lost packet to the receive buffer, but the withhold 
messages will be lost. so the client will never finished.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Michael....@gmail.com on 3 Sep 2010 at 3:12

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
What delivery method are you using? What sample can reproduce the problem?

Original comment by lidg...@gmail.com on 5 Sep 2010 at 10:40

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
imageclient imageserver, add simlation loss in imageserver.
from the log , you can see the unordered packet will be withheld in a queue.

Original comment by Michael....@gmail.com on 6 Sep 2010 at 1:12

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
the code about this problem is in NetConnection.Reliability.cs 
ExpectedReliableSequenceArrived

Original comment by Michael....@gmail.com on 6 Sep 2010 at 9:58

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
There's clearly an issue with this sample - using simulated loss it doesn't 
work. However; the sample doesn't use ReliableUnordered messages. I'm looking 
into it.

Original comment by lidg...@gmail.com on 7 Sep 2010 at 8:59

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
It's an issue with lost messages that are fragmented and uses reliable ordered 
delivery method. I'm working on it.

Original comment by lidg...@gmail.com on 7 Sep 2010 at 7:28

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
ok, that's what i mean.

Original comment by Michael....@gmail.com on 8 Sep 2010 at 10:55

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
The code for this issue has been completely replaced; assumed working.

Original comment by lidg...@gmail.com on 19 Oct 2010 at 7:05