Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
I just saw this is in the Future plan wiki. Glad to see but I would recommend
that this issue along with save/load are critical for usability. Additionally,
a user should not loose a page of work by clicking on the browsers back button.
I will add this as a comment on the save issue since I did not see it
mentioned anywhere.
Original comment by salmo...@gmail.com
on 12 Jun 2012 at 1:00
I think its worth to isolate each function to different issues
1. save/load, as issue 7
2. copy/paste
3. undo/redo
4. functions with keyboard shortcut (ctrl-c, ctrl-x, ctrl-v, ctrl-z, ctrl-y)
Original comment by gasolin
on 12 Jun 2012 at 1:00
Closer analysis of the cut/copy/paste triad show that they is not wholly
appropriate to Blockly. Think about when you use cut. That operation is only
used when one is moving something. In Blockly one would never cut a block and
paste it somewhere else, one would just drag it. As a result the three
clipboard operations boil down to a single operation: Duplicate.
Admittedly, advanced applications of Blockly might have a use for
cut/copy/paste if one were moving content between windows. However this is
very tricky since the windows might not know about each other's block types.
E.g. the Maze demo has a different set of blocks when compared with the Code
demo.
Since 'duplicate' is the overwhelming use-case when people think of
cut/copy/paste in the context of Blockly, I've added this function to the top
of the context menu. Let's wait until we see multi-window Blockly applications
before implementing the other three.
As gasolin says, undo/redo are a very separate set of operations. We have a
plan for these which involves something rather special. But we're being
temporarily blocked by a Google-internal issue. It will remain on the Future
list for right now.
You also mentioned clicking back and losing work. This was added some time ago
as a result of feedback. Blockly's demos now check that there are blocks
present, and if so issue a warning dialog.
Now that 'Duplicate' works I'm going to close this issue, with the
acknowledgement that undo and redo are very important and will be implemented
as soon as possible.
Original comment by neil.fra...@gmail.com
on 11 Jul 2012 at 9:16
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
salmo...@gmail.com
on 11 Jun 2012 at 3:39