inSeries relation not transformed correctly

[acka47]

Customer feedback from today:

die Titel http://lobid.org/nwbib/HT018290299 http://lobid.org/nwbib/HT017500124 http://lobid.org/nwbib/HT018483380 sind in zwei Reihen erschienen. Die zweite Schriftenreihe wird in der neuen NWBib gar nicht genannt und die Bandzählung der zweiten Reihe (?) als unverständliche Zeichenfolge (?)

While isPartOf link from these resources to http://lobid.org/resource/HT017500108 exists it isn't represented as inSeries relation, rather for the relation only a blank node with a type exists. The data is in field 463:

datafield ind2="1" ind1="-" tag="463">
    <subfield code="a">HT017500108</subfield>
</datafield> 

Currently it looks – for example – like this:

{ "@graph": [ {
    "@id" : "_:t4553",
    "@type" : "http://purl.org/lobid/lv#SeriesRelation"
  }, {
    "@id" : "_:t4554",
    "@type" : "http://purl.org/lobid/lv#SeriesRelation",
    "numbering" : "19",
    "series" : "http://lobid.org/resource/HT006514951"
  },
   "@id" : "http://lobid.org/resource/HT018290299",
    "inSeries" : [ "_:t4553", "_:t4554" ]
  } ]
}

[dr0i]

It's an repeatable field but wasn't configured as such. Deployed to small test. try curl "http://quaoar1.hbz-nrw.de:9200/lobid-resources-staging/json-ld-lobid/http:%2F%2Flobid.org%2Fresource%2FHT018290299" | json_pp.

[acka47]

+1

[dr0i]

Deployed to staging.

[acka47]

+1

@fsteeg There is a problem in NWBIb, though. See the examples http://test.lobid.org/nwbib/HT018290299, http://test.lobid.org/nwbib/HT017500124, http://test.lobid.org/nwbib/HT018483380. Two volume numbers are associated with only one link, the other link to a super-ordinated resource is not shown. We will hae to adjust this so that the links to series and multi-volume work are displayed separately with the associated volume number.. Will make an issue for this as soon as this one is deployed to production.

[dr0i]

Deployed to production, closing.