search

lobster-dao / overview

Description-FAQ of the process
MIT License
114 stars 24 forks source link

Idea: Use SafeSnap #12

Closed IvanGBi closed 2 years ago

IvanGBi commented 2 years ago

Somebody made the first proposal to enable SafeSnap feature by Gnosis, which makes sure that snapshot votes have technical force on what the multisig can do. I fully support it and voted YES. LINK HERE TO VOTE

Swader commented 2 years ago

Voted in. Close?

IvanGBi commented 2 years ago

Somebody needs to implement it now?

lebed2045 commented 2 years ago

I've create the proposal, and if there's not better candidate can implement it as well. but I need to coordinate it with someone from admins. Can I dm you sir Ivan?

IvanGBi commented 2 years ago

@lebed2045 I hear this one is pretty difficult to manage later, and doesn't present much benefits right now? Tbh it was voted on but without much context or prior discussion, so idk if it should be acted upon or not? Don't wanna set up precedents where DAO votes don't result in actions, but at the same time there was no deliberation on this topic prior to snapshot vote, so it violated the governance process? I am on the sidelines here, but perhaps we also need to wait for stark snapshot

lebed2045 commented 2 years ago

from a technical perspective it's possible to have both: safeSnap decision might be executed alongside with multisig guardians. Also, it's possible to install some timelocks etc. stark snapshot might be very far away in the future.

from DAO perspective whatever consensus decides, I'm happy to implement that.

If there's a need, I can do a little presentation for DAO about the advantages and disadvantages of safeSnap, and DAO can revote. I think it's okay to educate people on past voting so people can reconsider. Without rushing for execution upon the first voting. We don't want to repeat on-chain b̶r̶e̶x̶i̶t̶ IRL mistakes.

tartakovsky commented 2 years ago

Seems no one actually wants to do or have it? Closing until people ask for it again.