search

lofar-astron / factor

Facet calibration for LOFAR
http://www.astron.nl/citt/facet-doc
GNU General Public License v2.0
19 stars 12 forks source link

<class 'ConfigParser.NoSectionError'> in reimage master branch #140

Closed twshimwell closed 7 years ago

twshimwell commented 8 years ago

I am up to the reimaging after the selfcalibration of the calibrators is complete (I used the option not to image the fields after calibration). However, I get the following in the error:

2016-09-20 10:41:48 DEBUG facetimage_c1.5r-0.25t0.0u80.0_target: Pipeline start time: 2016-09-20T08:41:48 2016-09-20 10:41:48 INFO facetimage_c1.5r-0.25t0.0u80.0_target: LOFAR Pipeline (facetimage_c1.5r-0.25t0.0u80.0_target) starting. 2016-09-20 10:41:48 INFO facetimage_c1.5r-0.25t0.0u80.0_target: SASID = , MOMID = , Feedback method = None 2016-09-20 10:41:49 ERROR facetimage_c1.5r-0.25t0.0u80.0_target: 2016-09-20 10:41:49 ERROR facetimage_c1.5r-0.25t0.0u80.0_target: Failed pipeline run: target 2016-09-20 10:41:49 ERROR facetimage_c1.5r-0.25t0.0u80.0_target: Detailed exception information: 2016-09-20 10:41:49 ERROR facetimage_c1.5r-0.25t0.0u80.0_target: <class 'ConfigParser.NoSectionError'> 2016-09-20 10:41:49 ERROR facetimage_c1.5r-0.25t0.0u80.0_target: No section: '' 2016-09-20 10:41:49 ERROR facetimage_c1.5r-0.25t0.0u80.0_target: 2016-09-20 10:41:49 ERROR facetimage_c1.5r-0.25t0.0u80.0_target: LOFAR Pipeline finished unsuccesfully. 2016-09-20 10:41:49 WARNING facetimage_c1.5r-0.25t0.0u80.0_target: recipe facetimage_c1.5r-0.25t0.0u80.0_target completed with errors

twshimwell commented 8 years ago

changed branch and it seems to work in the wsclean branch which is good.

darafferty commented 8 years ago

Yes, sorry, I have made a number of bug fixes on the wsclean branch that I have not yet ported to the master one (partly because I intend that the wsclean branch will become the master soon).

However, I don't think you can use the wsclean branch to image the facets in this case, as the predict step used to add back the calibrator will go wrong (it should be done using CASA ft, as the subtract step on the master branch was done this way).

twshimwell commented 7 years ago

Ah ok. So this may just not work for now unless I start again using the wsclean branch

rvweeren commented 7 years ago

Think this can be closed since the wsclean branch is the default now.