Closed crhan closed 10 years ago
It's now compatible with ruby18 to ruby20(Travis report the same failed number in ruby18 -> ruby20)
And I fixed some spec in ipmitool version (I'm not familiar with freeipmi)
sorry, that messy message is from some rebase work. Fixed in my repo
CI passed with ruby18, ruby19, and ruby20. and the last commit may need some review. cause I'm not familiar with freeipmi
I just started using Ruby IPMI with TheForeman. This PR looks great, hope to see it upstream soon! Good riddance to Jeweler. Nothing is hard about Rubygems anymore that requires another layer on top of it.
Update: I reviewed all of the changes in this PR, and just have the two comments about @crhan email address in the .travis.yml, and wondering what was going on with the change in the number of required arguments in 1c2d6aa.
I am slammed with work at the moment. The freeipmi integration tests are failing which I can't run in travis (only at home), once the tests pass I can look at this merge request. Hoping to release 0.7 soon though.
Corey On Oct 7, 2013, at 4:53 PM, Aaron Stone notifications@github.com wrote:
I just started using Ruby IPMI with TheForeman. This PR looks great, hope to see it upstream soon!
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
ruby19 seems like passed in travisCI. So close
jeweler
is completely not compatible with ruby19 cause it use rcov by default and rewrite gemspec file on every release workflowrequire 'bundler/gem_tasks'
in your rake file and you will have some great tasks for build, install and releaseHave a look at this: http://bundler.io/v1.3/rubygems.html
I'm still working on this branch, discussion is welcome
PS: and yes. these code is compatible with ruby19, but not the development gems.