This may seem trivial/benign, but I'm trying to make sure all of our test refs are up-to-date (#63), and it's a bigger job than I'd like, so I'm hoping to grasp the existing code enough to just trust it and update the refs more or less automatically. This comment ended up throwing me for a loop more than I'd like to admit!
The comment now matches the current behavior, which should produce correct results. The previous description would turn this:
v redundant point
._._.
_./ \._
Into this:
v adjusted point; the point that used to be here is removed
._.
_.~~~ \._
Which is clearly wrong. Instead, we should (and do) get this:
v adjusted point; the point that used to be here is removed
.___.
_./ \._
I'm just going to merge; I don't have a lot of time these days and it's harder to get in/out of projects lately, so I want to keep up momentum while my head's in this space.
This may seem trivial/benign, but I'm trying to make sure all of our test refs are up-to-date (#63), and it's a bigger job than I'd like, so I'm hoping to grasp the existing code enough to just trust it and update the refs more or less automatically. This comment ended up throwing me for a loop more than I'd like to admit!
The comment now matches the current behavior, which should produce correct results. The previous description would turn this:
Into this:
Which is clearly wrong. Instead, we should (and do) get this: