I'd like to use gpp for preprocessing text files. There are different formats of these files and I want to support each different format by expressing the macro call as a comment. This way the macro is ignored when not preprocessed. For example consider I have a format where {::something/} is ignored. I call using -U "{::" "/}" "\B" " " "}" "{" "}" "#" "\\". Then there are other files with a different format, say %something. Again I can define appropriate strings using -U. Being able to define the call syntax is probably the most interesting feature to me. Note I only want to change the call syntax. The definition of the macros should use some fixed (probably the default) syntax.
But I cannot make it work:
When I change macros.gpp to {::define macroname bar} I'll get almost (note the additional new line) what I want
bar
But I don't want to provide the macros in each call syntax.
Apparently I am doing it wrong or it cannot be done using gpp. Any suggestions?
This is GPP 2.25 on Linux.
After some preliminary investigation, I suspect this is a bug—for some reason the user-defined mode is not being applied to the argument of --include. I will look into this when I have time.
I'd like to use
gpp
for preprocessing text files. There are different formats of these files and I want to support each different format by expressing the macro call as a comment. This way the macro is ignored when not preprocessed. For example consider I have a format where{::something/}
is ignored. I call using-U "{::" "/}" "\B" " " "}" "{" "}" "#" "\\"
. Then there are other files with a different format, say%something
. Again I can define appropriate strings using-U
. Being able to define the call syntax is probably the most interesting feature to me. Note I only want to change the call syntax. The definition of the macros should use some fixed (probably the default) syntax. But I cannot make it work:where
macros.gpp
isThe output is
(seems like no macro was applied) when I expected
When I change
macros.gpp
to{::define macroname bar}
I'll get almost (note the additional new line) what I wantBut I don't want to provide the macros in each call syntax. Apparently I am doing it wrong or it cannot be done using
gpp
. Any suggestions? This isGPP 2.25
on Linux.