Closed Serjobas closed 2 years ago
Why we do need these changes?
As I know, we need only project’s creation year. Second year missing already means present
.
I'm not sure whether it's a tough restriction or not. But seems like a common practice that I saw in other large libraries and wanted to implement in smaller libraries, maybe it would be helpful.
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/blob/14684bbae31918a394d61c75c23edee42d6c9761/doc/conf.py#L110 https://github.com/vercel/styled-jsx/blob/e8245813f9c3e633a9b2d2414fb11e6386b31216/license.md?plain=1#L3 https://github.com/styled-components/styled-components/blob/09929bd9bc05da085206c94679f07597b46212e4/LICENSE#L3
Not really. There are many other projects even without any year https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/main/LICENSE
I prefer to keep current format for consistency across my projects
Updated the outdated copyright year to the present. So there will not be a need for any further license year updates