Closed r2d2rigo closed 8 years ago
Thanks for your input. Another member on the forum raised the same issue and adviced to use LGPL or MIT as well. I shouldn't have left this running for so long.
I initially thought that it was a bad thing to change a license type because you change what people agreed on basically. But to be honest, I don't think anybody really read the license, and as far as my understanding goes, LGPL and MIT are less restrictive than GPLv2.
Hello, I have noticed that the license for this project is GPLv2. This means that any game that includes this library must be released under GPLv2 too:
I know GameJolt doesn't have paid games for now, but even so, many of the ones published in there aren't open sourced; using your library and not opensourcing them would make them violate the license.
Please reconsider changing it to LGPL or MIT/BSD.