Pros and cons for renaming?
Candidates for renaming? ScholaDoc, scta-text-schema
Pro for distancing the schema name from scta is that of all the schemas this is the most re-usable and it is a guiding principle of the schema, that it should contain sufficient info to be independently useful. That is doesn’t need to be connected to the scta rdf database to be able to be usefully displayed. LombardPress Schema helps capture that name. It also means the scta could adopt other schemas, but SCTA needs to identify rules that any “scta crawlable” schema must follow
This is a note pulled from @jeffreycwitt's notes:
Pros and cons for renaming? Candidates for renaming? ScholaDoc, scta-text-schema
Pro for distancing the schema name from scta is that of all the schemas this is the most re-usable and it is a guiding principle of the schema, that it should contain sufficient info to be independently useful. That is doesn’t need to be connected to the scta rdf database to be able to be usefully displayed. LombardPress Schema helps capture that name. It also means the scta could adopt other schemas, but SCTA needs to identify rules that any “scta crawlable” schema must follow