<del>
<!-- ... -->
<lb break="no"/>fesionis extitisset post hoc dialogum similum procedens ann ab abbate quoddam
<lb/>cisterciensis ordinis
</del>
de negotiis monachorum eddiseret an ne scilicet monachos habeant se
Since the deletion covers more than one line (only three shown here), it also covers the <lb/> elements in the text.
This means that the last <lb/> (in the line starting <lb/>cisterciensis ordinis) also gets deleted, even if it does "exist" in the line (starting with de negotiis ...).
How can one avoid losing that <lb/>?
I can imagine two possible answers:
Repeat the <lb/>, like so:
<del>
<!-- ... -->
<lb/>cisterciensis ordinis
</del>
<lb/>de negotiis monachorum eddiseret an ne scilicet monachos habeant se
Only include the <lb/> in the "existing" fragment, like so:
<del>
<!-- ... -->
cisterciensis ordinis
</del>
<lb/>de negotiis monachorum eddiseret an ne scilicet monachos habeant se
I'm inclined for the latter one, as the former one suggests that there are two <lb/> elements. But I'm unsure.
Consider the following fragment:
The TEI transcription would be something like:
Since the deletion covers more than one line (only three shown here), it also covers the
<lb/>elements in the text. This means that the last<lb/>(in the line starting<lb/>cisterciensis ordinis) also gets deleted, even if it does "exist" in the line (starting withde negotiis...).How can one avoid losing that
<lb/>?I can imagine two possible answers:
<lb/>, like so:<lb/>in the "existing" fragment, like so:I'm inclined for the latter one, as the former one suggests that there are two
<lb/>elements. But I'm unsure.