Closed stankudrow closed 1 month ago
@llchan, could you possibly review this PR and approve if you like it?
@long2ice , hello, it is up to you whether to merge this PR before the new asynch release or after (relates to the issue #116 ).
Thank you all in advance.
@long2ice , @llchan, any suggestions?
LGTM. It may be better to tighten in the future but this at least addresses my concerns about signals getting discarded. I don't think I can approve/merge the PR though so we still need to wait for a maintainer.
LGTM. It may be better to tighten in the future but this at least addresses my concerns about signals getting discarded. I don't think I can approve/merge the PR though so we still need to wait for a maintainer.
You have already expressed your support, thank you. Could you share your ideas on tiding and suggestions about future improvements?
@llchan , done in the #119 , you can close the issue #118 .
Resolves the issue #117 .