Closed raza2022 closed 1 year ago
Thank you for submitting an issue!
If this is a bug report, please be sure to include, at minimum, example code showing a small schema and any necessary calls with all their arguments, which will reproduce the issue. Even better, you can link to a saved online code editor example, where anyone can immediately run the code and see the issue.
If you are requesting a feature, include a code example of how you imagine it working if it were implemented.
If you need to edit your issue description, click the [...] and choose Edit.
Be patient. This is a free and freely licensed package that I maintain in my spare time. You may get a response in a day, but it could also take a month. If you benefit from this package and would like to see more of my time devoted to it, you can help by sponsoring.
sorry it's very simple maybe I missed it because of working at night it was simply solved by minCount
as at first read I thought it was only for singular values, now it's solved like below
bonuses: {
type: Array,
minCount: 1,
},
Hi dev, thanks for a great package, however, I want to confirm one thing about the requirement of nested object keys ([object]) let's see my use case there should be one object existing for that array else it will throw an error but I am surprised that if I passed the empty array [] it validates it too, I see some other way to validate object keys but my general assumption is all keys defined within the object should be validated unless passed the
{optional:true}
so I want it will only validate if I pass the array with at least one object else throw error on
[]