OWL Properties seem to use Editorial Notes versus Explanatory Notes?

[lonniev]

The table for OWL Property Dictionary, like its peer OWL Class Dictionary, is required to have the column Explanatory Note. OWL Classes do use Explanatory Notes. An inadequate sampling of OWL Properties suggests that those tend to use Editorial Notes instead. Currently, there is no table column for Editorial Notes.

What should be done?

[lonniev]

Mike requires that the Editorial Note be added anew and added back to all three tables.

[MikeHypercube]

I just raised an issue for this.

The disposition of editorial versus explanatory notes which you describe, is what the model was like before I did some very extensively work on this, in VOM. I am concerned in case what Elisa has passed on to you, somehow reversed or loses this work.

In any case, if I run the report on what I have here (and which I regard and am told I can regard as definitive) it most certainly will have a lot of explanatory notes and a small number of editorial notes.

I have also made my VOM available to you, so you might want to install it in a parallel path if you want to see what the model looks like with the annotations I myself will be reporting on. I find that VOM is fine with parallel structures since the project you are opening makes read only reference to the non parallel set.

Mike

Mike Bennett Head of Semantics and Standards EDM Council Tel: +44 20 7917 9522 Cell: +44 7721 420 730 www.edmcouncil.orghttp://www.edmcouncil.org Semantics Repository: www.hypercube.co.uk/edmcouncilhttp://www.hypercube.co.uk/edmcouncil

From: Lonnie VanZandt [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 3:31 PM To: lonniev/com.nomagic.cameo.partners.omg.fibo.plugins.derivedproperties Cc: Mike Bennett Subject: [com.nomagic.cameo.partners.omg.fibo.plugins.derivedproperties] OWL Properties seem to use Editorial Notes versus Explanatory Notes? (#17)

The table for OWL Property Dictionary, like its peer OWL Class Dictionary, is required to have the column Explanatory Note. OWL Classes do use Explanatory Notes. An inadequate sampling of OWL Properties suggests that those tend to use Editorial Notes instead. Currently, there is no table column for Editorial Notes.

What should be done?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/lonniev/com.nomagic.cameo.partners.omg.fibo.plugins.derivedproperties/issues/17.

[MikeHypercube]

There are no editorial orb explanatory notes against restrictions (we wanted to; there was an OWL issue; so we didn’t).

Therefore, you need only implement my recently created change request in Classes and Properties tables.

Hope that saves you some work.

Mike

Mike Bennett Head of Semantics and Standards EDM Council Tel: +44 20 7917 9522 Cell: +44 7721 420 730 www.edmcouncil.orghttp://www.edmcouncil.org Semantics Repository: www.hypercube.co.uk/edmcouncilhttp://www.hypercube.co.uk/edmcouncil

From: Lonnie VanZandt [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 3:36 PM To: lonniev/com.nomagic.cameo.partners.omg.fibo.plugins.derivedproperties Cc: Mike Bennett Subject: Re: [com.nomagic.cameo.partners.omg.fibo.plugins.derivedproperties] OWL Properties seem to use Editorial Notes versus Explanatory Notes? (#17)

Mike requires that the Editorial Note be added anew and added back to all three tables.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/lonniev/com.nomagic.cameo.partners.omg.fibo.plugins.derivedproperties/issues/17#issuecomment-23441210.

[MikeHypercube]

Issue #18 refers.

[lonniev]

Closed as duplicate of #18.

[lonniev]

Fixed with #18