Closed MikeHypercube closed 11 years ago
I believe that the table already does this. Is it broken?
I will let you know. Up to now, these classes have not had both a name and a label, it’s been one or the other, in separate model branches.
Mike
Mike Bennett Head of Semantics and Standards EDM Council Tel: +44 20 7917 9522 Cell: +44 7721 420 730 www.edmcouncil.orghttp://www.edmcouncil.org Semantics Repository: www.hypercube.co.uk/edmcouncilhttp://www.hypercube.co.uk/edmcouncil
From: Lonnie VanZandt [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 5:08 PM To: lonniev/com.nomagic.cameo.partners.omg.fibo.plugins.derivedproperties Cc: Mike Bennett Subject: Re: [com.nomagic.cameo.partners.omg.fibo.plugins.derivedproperties] Emit both the name and the label for restrictions and unions (anonymous classes) (#20)
I believe that the table already does this. Is it broken?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/lonniev/com.nomagic.cameo.partners.omg.fibo.plugins.derivedproperties/issues/20#issuecomment-23447744.
Yes, this capability is already present.
Cool! I was about test this.
Please update the table for Restrictions, to emit the UML class name in the "Name" column, and the label in the "Type of Thing" column.
Please apply this to logical unions also (see next issue).