Open ghost opened 2 years ago
IMO, the problem comes from a space(s) introduced by the new line inside \AtBeginDocument
. For me it is ok when I add comments at the end of the lines (which is a good practice) :
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usetikzlibrary{intersections,spath3}
\tikzset{
bridging path/.initial=arc,
bridging span/.initial=8pt,
bridging gap/.initial=4pt,
bridge/.style 2 args={
spath/split at intersections with={#1}{#2},
spath/insert gaps after components={#1}{\pgfkeysvalueof{/tikz/bridging span}},
spath/join components upright with={#1}{\pgfkeysvalueof{/tikz/bridging path}},
spath/split at intersections with={#2}{#1},
spath/insert gaps after components={#2}{\pgfkeysvalueof{/tikz/bridging gap}},
}
}
\AtBeginDocument{%
\tikz[overlay] \path[spath/save=arc] (0,0) arc[radius=1cm, start angle=180, delta angle=-180];%
}
\begin{document}
First line
\end{document}
This is addressed at https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/605800/86 and two solutions are presented there. I'll update the documentation to use those solutions rather than the current one.
@kpym Thanks! Your solution (introducing %) works indeed for the minimal example at hand. @loopspace Thanks! Please update the documentation the way you think it should be correct.
@loopspace Any progress on the documentation (perhaps, with a bit of testing) so far?
Must admit that this slipped my mind. Thanks for the nudge.
I've added a comment about this in the documentation, fix is https://github.com/loopspace/spath3/commit/8fcb4cb0a83b8a6c4930a6a7c0b2c4f08301a207, with a link to the TeX-SX question.
Consider the preamble suggested by the manual of v2.4, page 20:
When uncommenting the three lines \AtBeginDocument{…}, we get spurious space at the start of the document. (This may seem small, but in a larger example involving svmono and tons of other packages – which I unfortunately cannot cite – this issue magnifies such that I even get one spurious page at the start of the document.) This is a bug and should not happen. Here is the screenshot of diffpdf (the compilation result for the commented version is on the left, for the uncommented version on the right):
I would be happy if this issue finds attention. Thanks in advance.