Closed loganminhdang closed 1 year ago
Hi,
Yes, a footprint might still have peaks in the middle. I have seen this quite a lot, and I don't know how to explain it biologically, but it might be some Tn5 bias leftover which was not able to be corrected. Could also be a true biological signature of whatever TF is binding there, which is not fully understood yet. In such cases, I would still say that SCNSD
has a stronger footprint than SCNCT
due to the total height of the signal.
For the error message, can you create a second issue for that? It helps me keep the issues separated. Thank you!
Hi, this is probably a simple question, but can footprint regions still have peaks? I'm talking about a case such as this:
I wouldn't expect footprints to have this trace (normally, we see a dip indicating transcription factor binding and don't observe such a sharp peak). I wonder if you know what this peak may mean?