Closed Hugo-cell111 closed 11 months ago
Hi, sorry that I did not record any training logs. But I would suggest having some generated pseudo images for testing. The contrastive loss simply would not go down to a very low value.
Yes, the contrastive loss wouldn't go down to a very low value. But my loss has gone down very slightly(from about 3.84 to 3.8), and I wonder if you have met such situation. Thanks!
----------Reply to Message---------- On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 00:59 AM Shikun @.***> wrote:
Hi, sorry that I did not record any training logs. But I would suggest having some generated pseudo images for testing. The contrastive loss simply would not go down to a very low value.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
I think you should measure by the validation performance instead of the training loss which does not reflect the true model's performance.
Hi! may you provide the training log of the experiment? I want to see the convergence curve of contrastive loss. Because the implemented contrastive loss by myself borrows largely from your code but drops very slightly, I am afraid I might make some mistakes. Thanks a lot!