lorenzo-rovigatti / oxDNA

A new version of the code to simulate the oxDNA/oxRNA models, now equipped with Python bindings
https://dna.physics.ox.ac.uk/
GNU General Public License v3.0
38 stars 26 forks source link

[BUG] Relaxation of DNA structures behaves differently between recent oxDNA versions and the old one on oxServe #63

Open ErikPoppleton opened 10 months ago

ErikPoppleton commented 10 months ago

Describe the bug When pulling structures into desired starting configurations using mutual traps, the version of oxDNA running on the oxServe plugin of oxView is significantly more stable than the current version here (or this fork by @Jonahowns). I have not been able to successfully compile the old version used by oxServe for local testing (which is using code from this repository. I don't know the specific checkout, maybe @zoombya can double check?). This implies that one or more of the following is different between this older version of oxDNA and the current (post move to GitHub) implementations:

To Reproduce pull_test.zip The attached zip file contains a simulation where this behavior occurs. This structure is stable with the default oxServe input file, but the very similar input file in the example will explode within the first 10000 steps if run on the current oxDNA. The structure can be made stable by decreasing the dt 10x and the max_backbone_force 100x.

Expected behavior It would be nice to know what changed between the two versions. It would also be nice if the older oxDNA_anm version of relaxation turns out to be physically reasonable and the current behavior could be updated to match because it is much more successful at producing starting structures for simulations.

Desktop (please complete the following information):

lorenzo-rovigatti commented 10 months ago

I actually cannot reproduce this issue, since the latest oxDNA version and the one compiled from here give me very similar energies and similiar stretched configurations such as this one: Screenshot_20230822_122541

lorenzo-rovigatti commented 6 months ago

Erik, any news on this one?