Added OCPP 1.6 security extension

xBlaz3kx commented 8 months ago

Proposed changes

Implemented OCPP 1.6 security extension messages
Added implementation examples

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an x in the boxes that apply

[ ] Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
[x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
[ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
[x] Documentation Update (if none of the other choices apply)

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.

[ ] I have signed the CLA
[x] Lint and unit tests pass locally with my changes
[ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
[x] I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)
[x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Further comments

Code isn't unit tested
Worked fine in staging/production environment

dwibudut commented 8 months ago

Hi @xBlaz3kx,

Why not use the standard specification for ISO15118 in ocpp1.6, as described in the following document: https://openchargealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ocpp_1_6_ISO_15118_v10.pdf

xBlaz3kx commented 8 months ago

Hey @dwibudut,

this is the OCPP 1.6 security extension, which includes certificate management feature (TLS/SSL for websockets certificate management as well as ISO 15118 certificate management) among other features.

I'm not sure what you're trying to say - have I implemented something wrong in regards to certificate management?

dwibudut commented 8 months ago

Hi @xBlaz3kx,

There isn't anything wrong. Actually, I'm a little confused about whether the document (version via DataTransfer) is for features: for example CertificateSigned, GetInstalledCertificateIds in document above is no longer valid or only for PnC

xBlaz3kx commented 8 months ago

@dwibudut As I said before, this Security extension implementation has little to do with Plug and Charge feature implementation for OCPP 1.6. Here you can find any relevant information regarding this implementation.

Also, in the PnC specification, this note is applicable:

xBlaz3kx commented 8 months ago

Moving to #266

lorenzodonini / ocpp-go